← Back

The Business Problem

Mobile was quietly bleeding money

When I joined Brandwatch (formerly Falcon.io), the mobile apps were the company's dirty secret. While the web platform powered enterprise social media management for Fortune 500s, our iOS and Android apps were generating complaints, driving churn, and getting ignored by leadership.

$60K ARRLost due to mobile app limitations
User complaint

The data was damning: support tickets mentioning “mobile” had a 3x higher churn correlation than any other category. We were losing $50K+ in MRR annually to users who cited mobile limitations in exit surveys. Yet the apps hadn't seen a meaningful update in 18 months.

The challenge wasn't technical debt alone—it was organizational neglect. Mobile was seen as a “nice-to-have” in a web-first company—no team really owned the project. The apps existed in maintenance mode while competitors shipped polished, single-app experiences with 100K+ users to our thousands.

Fragmented app portfolio

The fragmented app-portfolio

My Role

Building the case for a path forward

I was brought in to answer a strategic question: what should Brandwatch do about mobile?

My job wasn't to redesign screens—it was to build the case for a path forward and define what that path should look like. I led the discovery effort, designed the research program, synthesized findings for leadership, and created the product vision for a consolidated app.

iOS App Store listing
Google Play Store listing

iOS Appstore and Google Playstore appearance of the same app

The Insight

Fragmentation & reliability issues

The conventional wisdom was that we needed to “fix” each app incrementally. My research killed that assumption.

Through 9 customer interviews, stakeholder sessions across 4 departments, competitor analysis of 9 products, and a design audit, I surfaced a pattern: users didn't want three better apps—they wanted one app that matched their unified desktop workflow.

Internally, teams were afraid to promote the apps. Customer-facing staff described feeling “embarrassed” to suggest mobile solutions.

User feedbackUser feedback

The Research

Three personas, three use cases

The Manager

The Manager

Needs quick approval workflows on-the-go. Checking post queues during commute, approving content between meetings. Values speed over depth.

Key Need

“Approve posts in under 10 seconds”

The Creator

The Creator

Creates content from events, conferences, or field. Needs mobile-first publishing with photo editing and hashtag suggestions. Desktop is secondary.

Key Need

“Publish Instagram stories in real-time”

The Responder

The Responder

Monitors brand mentions and responds to crises. Needs push notifications, sentiment analysis, and quick-reply templates. Uptime is everything.

Key Need

“Never miss a critical mention”

The through-line: all three needed to complete critical tasks without switching to desktop—exactly the moments mobile should shine.

Main navigation concept

Main navigation concept

The Process

From diagnosis to validated vision

Phase 1: Diagnosis — Design audit across all three apps. The team helped rating issues by severity against our design principles. Average score: 2.6 out of 5 😩

Phase 2:Customer Research — 9 interviews with power users who'd pushed through the friction. Focused on jobs-to-be-done, not just complaints.

Phase 3:Vision & Validation — Designed a consolidated app concept with bottom tab navigation, three-step publishing flow mirroring desktop, unified content calendar, and minimal black-and-white UI letting content stand out.

Desktop publishing flow
Mobile publishing flow

Desktop and mobile publishing flow alignment

The Outcome

Groundwork laid, now being built upon

The vision was validated and ready for development. Leadership had signed off, the prototype had passed critique, and we had a prioritized roadmap.

Then priorities shifted. A major acquisition created new integration demands, and R&D resources were reallocated. Mobile was put on hold—but not abandoned.

What survived: The research became the definitive internal reference for mobile customer needs. The design audit established quality standards across other surfaces. The personas, validated flows, and design patterns didn't gather dust—I've since learned the team is actively reusing the designs, insights, and learnings from this work in their current mobile renewal initiative. The groundwork meant they could restart without starting from scratch.

← Back to home

Read another case study